The Abuse of Absolute Adjectives

Ever since I blogged about The 5 Most Annoying Grammar Mistakes people keep mentioning other common errors which bug them. This post is a request from my mother, whose pet peeve is the commonly abused absolute adjective. When a TV presenter describes something as “very unique” she loses it! But as we’ll see, this problem is a simple matter of people not thinking about what they’re saying.

So, absolute adjectives are words such as unique, full, empty, excellent, complete, impossible, dead. Most normal adjectives can be compared and intensified, for example, red, redder, reddest or good, better, best. Adverbs such as very, more, less, most, best, almost, etc. are also used to compare and intensify adjectives, for example  “the sky is very dark tonight”. However, the special and surprising thing about absolute adjectives is that they’re absolute and they cannot be compared or intensified at all because it wouldn’t make any sense. There isn’t a big list of absolute adjectives that you can consult when in doubt (well I’m sure there probably is one somewhere but that’s not the point) because it’s usually logical and obvious whether you can apply very or most to an adjective. The best example of this is dead. You can’t really say something’s very dead or that someone is deader than someone else (unless you’ve been watching too many vampire programs, in which case this probably wasn’t the best example for me to choose). 

However, despite the remarkable amount of words in the English language, people still struggle to express themselves properly, which is where we fall into bad habits. People use the same words again and again, when really they should be consulting a thesaurus more regularly, or just putting more thought into what they really mean. Instead of choosing the word unique, you might think of opting for something else which fits the description better, say extraordinary or marvellous. If we widened our vocabulary a little, we wouldn’t be using all the same words again and again and therefore wouldn’t feel the need to intensify or compare things quite so much. If you keep using the word unique for everything, you start to feel the need to say that the most recent unique thing you’ve found is more or less so than the previous thing. So generally, I would recommend trying to use a greater variety of words to avoid falling into this sort of a trap.

Also, I think we’re quite enthusiastic these days, we just LOVE to say how GREAT or AWFUL everything is! Using one adjective on its own in a sentence without ten adverbs makes things sound boring and bland: “How was the show, dear?” “It was good”… See? Bland. You’re more likely to say, “It was REALLY THE BEST MOST EXCITING THING I’VE EVER SEEN EVER”. That’s more like it.

With these two elements in mind, we get people saying things like “that’s the most impossible challenge  yet” or “his voice is very unique”. It doesn’t really make sense when you think about it, how can something that’s one of a kind be very one of a kind? It’s surely beyond comparison, as there is nothing to compare it to. And similarly if something simply cannot be done, you cannot say that it is less or more cannot-be-done-able. It just doesn’t work, and in comes my mother, shouting at the TV again (“idiots”).

The worst thing about issues like this is that they’re often actively encouraged or left uncorrected by people who should know better. Wikipedia very helpfully states that although grading and comparing absolutes is discouraged in formal writing,

“such words are routinely and frequently qualified in contemporary speech and writing…Internet searches for “more complete” or “most complete” establish the frequency of this usage with millions of examples”

This is a completely pointless thing to say (here’s the link); just because lots of people do it doesn’t make it right! People frequently put your instead of you’re as well, but that doesn’t mean the English language is suddenly going to abandon you’re. I hope not anyway. I think I’m reading too much into this Wikipedia page, but they could have just said it was incorrect and left it at that!

So, on behalf of my mother, I would maybe ask that people in general put a little extra thought into what they really mean. She doesn’t really like shouting at the TV, she just feels a bit strongly about this particular point. There are SOOOOOO many words in the English language, let’s try and use some different ones eh? And for God’s sake, THINK about what you’re saying!

If you’re interested in learning more about this general subject it might be worth checking out comparative adverbs/adjectives and superlatives. They’re awesome.

Does anyone else have a pet peeve? I’d love to hear about it if you do! 🙂


Typos Are Taking Over The World!

Yesterday, “Bandersnatch Cummerbund” was trending on Twitter. A Journalist writing for The Washington Post had obviously fallen foul of spellcheck, misspelling Benedict Cumberbatch much to everyone’s amusement. In fact, this had me in stitches! However, this is typical of a more worrying trend seen in the media. It seems to me that more mistakes are being made more often. Everything I read (especially in online newspapers, blogs and magazines) is littered with typos, grammatical errors, spelling mistakes; bad writing habits and shoddy proofreading are evident EVERYWHERE. I find this faintly hilarious given the amount of sub-editor jobs around and the amount of “experience” you have to have in order to get such a prestigious job (surely a test would suffice?!). Not that I’m bitter or anything!

Now before I go on I want to make a few things clear. I totally understand that people make mistakes. Everyone does. I know I do. Even the most meticulous proofreader will occasionally miss the odd comma. I recognise that it’s the mistakes that people notice; it’s rare these days for people to compliment rather than complain, which is a bit sad. I also understand that people read more online now than they ever have done before. The number of blogs and online magazines and newspapers has increased dramatically over the last few years, with sites publishing new articles and posts every couple of hours. Therefore you could argue that life these days is more demanding as a writer/sub-editor as there is a lot more content to write and check, and it has to be done so quickly. I will also admit that this increase in free online articles probably means that I read a lot more non-fiction on a daily basis now, so I might just notice mistakes which are common in the press.

However, here’s the thing: I hardly ever, ever, go one day without seeing a blindingly obvious mistake in an online article. Clearly people have not been following my obvious tips for writing! How do these mistakes keep slipping through the net? Are sub-editors failing or is it the editors themselves? It just makes me wonder sometimes: is writing correctly less important to writers/editors than it used to be? Have people stopped taking pride in their writing? Am I making a fuss over nothing? Am I officially turning into an angry old person? I obviously don’t have answers to these questions, but I would love to hear from anyone who does.

Here are a couple of examples I have found online in the past week. I didn’t even have to look hard. The very first article I read after thinking about this contained a giant error in it. Believe me, there are lots more out there!

1.The Huffington Post.

Nick Watts, writing about anorexia says, “Put all the facts together and it is almost like we are glamourising a serious medical condition, in fact were not almost doing it, we are doing it”. The apostrophe missed out of “were” renders this sentence useless. Although I’m not a big fan of this sentence generally, as it reads awkwardly. However, the article itself was actually quite interesting (I almost feel mean slagging it off), here’s the link to it.

2.The Daily Telegraph

See below where missing speech marks make it confusing about what is tattooed on a man’s head!

This is made more comically confusing by the fact that the tattoo is awful and you can barely read it! Ok it’s not that hard to work out what it says but you get my point. Missing punctuation!

3. Sky TV

This was on my TV so technically not found online but it’s still wrong! I read this through a few times before I came to the conclusion that no, it doesn’t make any sense.

4. The guardian

When I first read this I worried that “an nose” was a racing term I’d never heard of, sort of like how some people say “an historian”.

5. The Sun

 This little caption clearly wasn’t checked by anyone before it went up on the Sun website last week, such a lazy, basic error (and a ridiculous comment anyway).

 The list goes on and on and on. Please people in the media, can you just try to either be better at proofreading or hire me to help you? I’m tired of all the mistakes, they’re wearing me out.


Your and You’re

Do you ever get mixed up between “your” and “you’re” when writing? It’s easily done. Here’s a video I did to clear things up a little. Also see my other post “Let’s get this party started” as it contains a short video on those other easily mixed up homophones “their”, “there” and “they’re”.


Let’s get this party started

Hello!

I’m still struggling to sort out the layout and whatnot of the blog, and I currently haven’t told anyone that it exists, but I thought I might as well start blogging first and sort everything else out later! I’m sort of hoping that given some time, I will figure out what to do with the look of the blog, or I could get my amazing sister Anna Clarke (professional photographer/all round creative genius) to sort it out for me! Failing that, I could rope in her husband Simon Clarke, who is nifty at all things computery/technical (as well as also being enviably creative…ergh). But until that happens, I’m pretty much stuck with it like this!

Anyway, I though I could start everything off with a video I did for an anonymous person who needed a bit of a hand with some homophones (words that sound the same but are spelled differently). I thought a video was a bit more fun than a lecture, and it gave me an excuse to play around with my then-relatively-new macbook pro.

Here it is: my first grammar video on homophones! There will, undoubtedly, be more videos to follow shortly. Look out for a certain furry guest star!